Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Addon Llm Judge Evals

Listed
ajrlewis·vlatest·ai-ml

Provides LLMs guidance and assistance for building AI and machine learning applications.

Repository

Install on your platform

This skill no longer installs under the name addon-llm-judge-evals. ajrlewis/ai-skills is deleted or private, so it cannot be installed from.

We check each listing against its upstream repository with the rules the skills CLI uses, last on 2026-10-22. We don't show a command we know will fail.

Repository install instructions

What we know about this skill

Publisher

ajrlewis

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

Nobody has reviewed this code. TrustedSkills indexes and links skills; it does not audit, run or scan them. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent — read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

We could not read this skill's source, so none of the checks below were run.

Not scanned. repository not found or private Source recorded as ajrlewis/ai-skills.
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

This skill provides evaluation capabilities for Large Language Models (LLMs). It allows you to assess LLM outputs against predefined criteria, providing structured feedback and scores. The tool is designed to automate aspects of model validation and ensure consistent quality across different generations.

When to use it

  • Evaluating code generation: Assess the correctness and efficiency of code produced by an LLM.
  • Content quality assessment: Score generated text based on factors like relevance, coherence, and factual accuracy.
  • Comparing model outputs: Compare responses from different LLMs for a given prompt to identify strengths and weaknesses.
  • Automated testing pipelines: Integrate evaluations into automated workflows for continuous model improvement.

Key capabilities

  • LLM output evaluation
  • Scoring against criteria
  • Structured feedback generation
  • Model comparison

Example prompts

  • "Evaluate the following code snippet: [code]"
  • "Score this text based on relevance and coherence: [text]"
  • "Compare these two responses to the prompt 'Write a poem about cats': [response 1] [response 2]"

Tips & gotchas

The quality of evaluations depends heavily on the clarity and specificity of the evaluation criteria. Ensure your prompts clearly define what constitutes good or bad output for optimal results.