Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Peer Review

Checked
braselog·vlatest·writing

Analyzes Braesology data to provide constructive peer review feedback on user submissions, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add braselog/researchassistant --skill peer-review -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

braselog

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill passed all 6 checks. We read its files at one commit and looked for the things that make a skill dangerous to run — not for whether it works.

  • Declares what it does: passed

    SKILL.md parses and declares a name and a description.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned braselog/researchassistant at 6e1e60a1d7.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Commit
6e1e60a1d7
Manifest
.github/skills/peer-review/SKILL.md
Scanned
1 file, 19 lines
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

This skill provides automated peer review capabilities for research papers. It can analyze submitted text and provide feedback on aspects of writing quality, clarity, and potential areas for improvement. The tool aims to streamline the peer review process by offering initial assessments before human reviewers engage.

When to use it

  • Reviewing draft research papers within a team or organization.
  • Providing preliminary feedback to authors before formal submission.
  • Identifying potential issues with clarity, grammar, and structure in scientific writing.
  • Assisting researchers in improving the quality of their manuscripts.

Key capabilities

  • Automated text analysis
  • Feedback on writing quality
  • Identification of areas for improvement
  • Clarity assessment

Example prompts

  • "Please peer review this draft research paper."
  • "Can you provide feedback on the clarity and structure of this manuscript?"
  • "Analyze this document and suggest improvements to its writing quality."

Tips & gotchas

The skill provides an initial assessment; it is not a replacement for thorough human review. Always verify the suggestions provided by the tool with expert judgment.