Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Content Evaluation Framework

Listed
panaversity·vlatest·other

This framework assesses content quality based on defined criteria, ensuring accuracy and relevance for informed decisions.

Repository

Install on your platform

This skill no longer installs under the name content-evaluation-framework. panaversity/agentfactory is deleted or private, so it cannot be installed from.

We check each listing against its upstream repository with the rules the skills CLI uses, last on 2026-10-22. We don't show a command we know will fail.

Repository install instructions

What we know about this skill

Publisher

panaversity

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

Nobody has reviewed this code. TrustedSkills indexes and links skills; it does not audit, run or scan them. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent — read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

We could not read this skill's source, so none of the checks below were run.

Not scanned. repository not found or private Source recorded as panaversity/agentfactory.
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

This skill provides a structured framework for evaluating educational book chapters and lessons against defined quality standards. It uses a 6-point rubric, assessing content based on criteria like constitutional compliance and pedagogical effectiveness. The evaluation process is systematic, generating a report with scores and evidence to guide improvements or confirm high quality.

When to use it

  • To assess the quality of educational materials before publication or distribution.
  • When needing a consistent and quantifiable method for evaluating content.
  • To identify areas where lessons or chapters can be improved to better align with constitutional principles and pedagogical best practices.
  • For ensuring that content meets specific quality benchmarks.

Key capabilities

  • Constitution Compliance Check: A mandatory initial assessment against defined constitutional principles.
  • Weighted Scoring: Evaluates categories of content quality using a weighted formula.
  • Evidence-Based Reporting: Generates reports including scores and supporting evidence (quotes, line numbers).
  • Tiered Assessment: Classifies content as Excellent, Good, or Conditional Pass based on the final score.
  • Utilizes specific files: .specify/memory/constitution.md, .specify/memory/content-quality-memory.md, references/rubric-details.md, references/constitution-checklist.md, and references/evaluation-template.md

Example prompts

  • "Evaluate this chapter."
  • "Check the quality of this lesson using the content-evaluation-framework."
  • "Score this content for constitutional compliance."
  • "Run content-evaluation-framework on preface.md"

Tips & gotchas

  • Constitution First: The skill requires reading and assessing constitution.md before any other evaluation steps. Failure to do so will halt the process.
  • File Dependencies: The framework relies on several specific files for its operation; ensure these are accessible within the agent's environment.
  • No MCP Servers Required: This skill does not require access to external MCP servers.