Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Evaluator

Checked
simhacker·vlatest·other·MIT

The Evaluator assesses text for quality, coherence, and adherence to specific criteria, streamlining feedback and ensuring consistent results.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add simhacker/moollm --skill evaluator -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

simhacker

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill passed all 6 checks. We read its files at one commit and looked for the things that make a skill dangerous to run — not for whether it works.

  • Declares what it does: passed

    SKILL.md parses and declares a name and a description.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned simhacker/moollm at 8f6d840b2f.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Commit
8f6d840b2f
Manifest
skills/evaluator/SKILL.md
Scanned
1 file, 230 lines
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

The Evaluator skill provides a mechanism to assess and score text based on provided criteria. It can analyze text for sentiment, relevance, or adherence to specific guidelines. The output is a numerical score representing the evaluation result along with optional explanations of how that score was derived.

When to use it

  • Content Quality Control: Evaluate generated articles or blog posts against style guides and readability metrics.
  • Sentiment Analysis: Determine the emotional tone (positive, negative, neutral) of customer reviews or social media comments.
  • Relevance Scoring: Assess how well a search result matches a user's query.
  • Code Review Assistance: Evaluate code snippets for adherence to coding standards and potential errors.

Key capabilities

  • Sentiment scoring
  • Relevance assessment
  • Adherence to guidelines evaluation
  • Numerical score output
  • Explanatory reasoning (optional)

Example prompts

  • "Evaluate this product review: 'The product was amazing! I highly recommend it.' and provide a sentiment score."
  • "Score the following article for relevance to the query 'best hiking boots': [article text]"
  • "Assess this email draft against our company's tone of voice guidelines. Provide a score and explain your reasoning."

Tips & gotchas

The quality of evaluation depends heavily on the clarity and specificity of the criteria provided. Vague or ambiguous instructions may lead to inconsistent results.