Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Agent Evaluation

Checked
guia-matthieu·vlatest·agents·MIT

Evaluates Guia-Matthieu agents based on predefined metrics, providing actionable feedback for performance improvement.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill agent-evaluation -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

guia-matthieu

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill passed all 6 checks. We read its files at one commit and looked for the things that make a skill dangerous to run — not for whether it works.

  • Declares what it does: passed

    SKILL.md parses and declares a name and a description.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills at 4108f5c010.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Commit
4108f5c010
Manifest
skills/meta/agent-evaluation/SKILL.md
Scanned
1 file, 286 lines
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

The guia-matthieu-agent-evaluation skill allows you to evaluate AI agents based on provided criteria. It can assess an agent's performance against specific benchmarks and provide a structured evaluation report. This helps in identifying strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement within the agent’s capabilities.

When to use it

  • Agent Performance Review: Regularly assess how well your agent is performing its tasks.
  • Benchmark Comparison: Compare different agents or versions of an agent against a standardized set of criteria.
  • Debugging Agent Issues: Pinpoint specific areas where an agent struggles and requires further training or adjustment.
  • Iterative Improvement: Track the impact of changes made to an agent’s design or training data over time.

Key capabilities

  • Agent evaluation based on defined criteria.
  • Structured report generation.
  • Performance assessment against benchmarks.
  • Identification of strengths and weaknesses.

Example prompts

  • "Evaluate this agent's response to the following prompt: [prompt text]."
  • "Assess the agent’s ability to summarize this document: [document content]."
  • "Compare Agent A's performance on task X with Agent B's."

Tips & gotchas

The quality of the evaluation depends heavily on the clarity and specificity of the criteria provided. Ensure your benchmarks are well-defined for accurate and meaningful results.