Llm Evaluation

🌐Community
by hermeticormus · vlatest · Repository

Provides LLMs guidance and assistance for building AI and machine learning applications.

Install on your platform

We auto-selected Claude Code based on this skill’s supported platforms.

1

Run in terminal (recommended)

terminal
claude mcp add hermeticormus-llm-evaluation npx -- -y @trustedskills/hermeticormus-llm-evaluation
2

Or manually add to ~/.claude/settings.json

~/.claude/settings.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hermeticormus-llm-evaluation": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@trustedskills/hermeticormus-llm-evaluation"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Requires Claude Code (claude CLI). Run claude --version to verify your install.

About This Skill

What it does

This skill, hermeticormus-llm-evaluation, provides automated evaluation of Large Language Model (LLM) outputs. It assesses responses based on pre-defined criteria and generates structured reports with scores for various aspects like helpfulness, accuracy, and safety. The tool can be used to benchmark LLMs or identify areas where a model needs improvement.

When to use it

  • Benchmarking different LLMs: Compare the performance of several models on a standardized set of prompts and evaluation criteria.
  • Evaluating prompt engineering efforts: Assess how changes to prompts impact the quality and safety of LLM responses.
  • Identifying model weaknesses: Pinpoint areas where an LLM consistently struggles, such as factual accuracy or avoiding harmful content.
  • Automated regression testing: Ensure that updates to an LLM don’t degrade its performance on critical tasks.

Key capabilities

  • Automated evaluation of LLM responses
  • Scoring based on predefined criteria (helpfulness, accuracy, safety)
  • Generation of structured reports with scores
  • Benchmarking across multiple models

Example prompts

  • "Evaluate the following response from an LLM: [LLM Response] against these criteria: helpfulness, accuracy, and safety."
  • "Compare the responses to this prompt '[Prompt]' between Model A and Model B, focusing on factual correctness."
  • "Run a regression test on the model's ability to answer questions about historical events. Provide a detailed report of scores."

Tips & gotchas

  • The quality of evaluation depends heavily on the clarity and specificity of the criteria provided. Well-defined scoring rubrics are essential for reliable results.

Tags

🛡️

TrustedSkills Verification

Unlike other registries that point to live repositories, TrustedSkills pins every skill to a verified commit hash. This protects you from malicious updates — what you install today is exactly what was reviewed and verified.

Security Audits

Gen Agent Trust HubPass
SocketPass
SnykPass

Details

Version
vlatest
License
Author
hermeticormus
Installs
5

🌐 Community

Passed automated security scans.