Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Model Evaluator

Listed
eddiebe147·vlatest·ai-ml

Evaluates large language model outputs against provided criteria, scoring relevance, accuracy, and style.

Repository

Install on your platform

This skill no longer installs under the name model-evaluator. eddiebe147/claude-settings is deleted or private, so it cannot be installed from.

We check each listing against its upstream repository with the rules the skills CLI uses, last on 2026-10-22. We don't show a command we know will fail.

Repository install instructions

What we know about this skill

Publisher

eddiebe147

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

Nobody has reviewed this code. TrustedSkills indexes and links skills; it does not audit, run or scan them. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent — read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

We could not read this skill's source, so none of the checks below were run.

Not scanned. repository not found or private Source recorded as eddiebe147/claude-settings.
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

The Model Evaluator skill provides a framework for rigorously assessing and comparing machine learning model performance across various dimensions. It guides users through designing evaluation protocols, selecting appropriate metrics, and performing statistical analysis to ensure reliable conclusions about model selection. The skill supports evaluating models like LLMs, classifiers, and custom models, focusing on aspects beyond simple accuracy scores such as efficiency, robustness, fairness, and production readiness.

When to use it

  • Comparing different machine learning models (e.g., LLMs) for a specific task.
  • Determining which model best fits your particular use case and constraints.
  • Designing evaluation protocols to assess predictive performance, computational efficiency, robustness, fairness, calibration, and production readiness.
  • Creating test sets including held-out data, edge cases, adversarial examples, and tests for distribution shift.
  • Evaluating LLMs based on task accuracy, response quality, safety, alignment, and efficiency.

Key capabilities

  • Evaluation Protocol Design: Guides users through defining objectives, selecting metrics (Accuracy, F1, AUC-ROC, RMSE, MAE, R-squared, BLEU, ROUGE, BERTScore, NDCG, MRR, MAP), and planning statistical methodology.
  • Comparative Evaluation Execution: Facilitates consistent evaluation across models, confidence interval calculation, and statistical significance testing.
  • LLM-Specific Evaluation: Supports defining dimensions like task accuracy (factual, reasoning, coding), response quality, safety, alignment, and efficiency; creating representative datasets with ground truth answers or human preference data; and implementing automated metrics and LLM-as-judge evaluations.
  • Metric Selection: Provides a table of common metrics for different task types (Classification, Regression, Ranking, Generation, LLM).

Example prompts

  • "Design an evaluation protocol to compare two classification models."
  • "What metrics should I use to evaluate the performance of an LLM on a coding task?"
  • "Create a test set with adversarial examples for my image classifier."

Tips & gotchas

  • The skill emphasizes designing robust evaluation methodologies, so consider all relevant factors beyond just accuracy.
  • Proper statistical methodology (sample sizes, confidence intervals, corrections) is crucial for reliable results.
  • The skill provides guidance but requires user input and understanding of machine learning principles to effectively implement the evaluation process.