Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Evaluation

Checked
muratcankoylan·vlatest·writing·MIT

This "Evaluation" skill assesses and scores text based on predefined criteria, providing objective insights for improved content quality.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add muratcankoylan/agent-skills-for-context-engineering --skill evaluation --full-depth -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

muratcankoylan

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill passed all 6 checks. We read its files at one commit and looked for the things that make a skill dangerous to run — not for whether it works.

  • Declares what it does: passed

    SKILL.md parses and declares a name and a description.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned muratcankoylan/agent-skills-for-context-engineering at 6dbe1a1d86.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Commit
6dbe1a1d86
Manifest
skills/evaluation/SKILL.md
Scanned
3 files, 1,227 lines
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

The muratcankoylan-evaluation skill provides a mechanism for evaluating text based on specified criteria. It can assess the quality, relevance, or other characteristics of textual data according to user-defined guidelines. This allows for automated assessment and comparison of different text outputs.

When to use it

  • Content Quality Control: Evaluate generated articles or blog posts against style guides or specific quality metrics.
  • A/B Testing Analysis: Compare the performance of two different versions of marketing copy based on user engagement scores.
  • Summarization Assessment: Judge the accuracy and completeness of summaries produced by another skill.
  • Code Review Support: Evaluate code snippets for readability, efficiency, or adherence to coding standards.

Key capabilities

  • Text evaluation based on custom criteria
  • Assessment of text quality
  • Relevance scoring
  • Comparison of textual data

Example prompts

  • "Evaluate this article: [article content] against the following rubric: [rubric details]"
  • "Score these two summaries (Summary A: [summary A], Summary B: [summary B]) for accuracy and completeness."
  • "Assess this code snippet [code snippet] for readability and efficiency."

Tips & gotchas

The quality of the evaluation heavily depends on the clarity and specificity of the criteria provided. Vague or poorly defined guidelines will likely result in inconsistent or unreliable assessments.