Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Naming Analyzer

Checked
softaworks·vlatest·backend·MIT

The Naming Analyzer identifies brand names’ potential for trademark issues and memorability, safeguarding your business's identity.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add softaworks/agent-toolkit --skill naming-analyzer -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

softaworks

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill passed all 6 checks. We read its files at one commit and looked for the things that make a skill dangerous to run — not for whether it works.

  • Declares what it does: passed

    SKILL.md parses and declares a name and a description.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned softaworks/agent-toolkit at 3027f20f31.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Commit
3027f20f31
Manifest
skills/naming-analyzer/SKILL.md
Scanned
2 files, 541 lines
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

The naming-analyzer skill helps identify and evaluate the quality of names used in software projects, including variables, functions, classes, and files. It provides feedback on readability, consistency, and adherence to naming conventions.

When to use it

  • Reviewing codebases for inconsistent or unclear naming practices
  • Refactoring legacy code with ambiguous identifiers
  • Enforcing team-wide coding standards during development

Key capabilities

  • Analyzes variable, function, and class names for clarity and consistency
  • Detects non-descriptive or overly verbose names
  • Suggests improvements based on common naming conventions (e.g., camelCase, snake_case)

Example prompts

  • "Analyze the naming in this Python module for readability."
  • "Check if these JavaScript function names follow standard conventions."
  • "Evaluate the clarity of variable names in this C++ file."

Tips & gotchas

  • Ensure the code files are properly formatted and accessible to the skill.
  • The tool may not account for domain-specific naming conventions, so manual review is recommended for specialized contexts.