Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Receiving Code Review

Checked
nickcrew·vlatest·backend·MIT

Automates code review feedback parsing from nickcrew's style, flagging potential issues and suggesting improvements for testers.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add nickcrew/claude-cortex --skill receiving-code-review -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

nickcrew

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill passed all 6 checks. We read its files at one commit and looked for the things that make a skill dangerous to run — not for whether it works.

  • Declares what it does: passed

    SKILL.md parses and declares a name and a description.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned nickcrew/claude-ctx-plugin at bb47af79ad.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Commit
bb47af79ad
Manifest
skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md
Scanned
1 file, 197 lines
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

This skill allows an AI agent to process and respond to code review feedback. It can analyze comments, identify areas for improvement based on the reviewer's suggestions, and generate potential code modifications. The agent aims to understand the context of the review and provide helpful responses or propose solutions.

When to use it

  • You have received a code review with numerous comments and want assistance in understanding and addressing them.
  • You are unsure how to implement specific feedback from a reviewer and need suggestions for improvement.
  • You want to automate some of the response process when acknowledging and acting on code review feedback.
  • You're looking for an AI assistant to help you learn best practices through constructive criticism.

Key capabilities

  • Analyzes code review comments.
  • Identifies areas for improvement based on reviewer suggestions.
  • Generates potential code modifications.
  • Understands the context of the review.

Example prompts

  • "Here's my code and the associated code review feedback. Can you help me understand what needs to be improved?"
  • "I received this code review, but I’m not sure how to address comment number 3. What are some possible solutions?"
  • "Please analyze this code review and suggest changes I can make to improve its quality."

Tips & gotchas

The skill's effectiveness depends on the clarity and specificity of the provided code review feedback. Providing the full context (code, comments, reviewer notes) will yield better results.