Nsfc Reviewers

Name: Nsfc Reviewers
Author: huangwb8

🌐Community

by huangwb8 · vlatest · Repository

This skill simulates NSFC reviewer feedback on research proposals, offering valuable insights for improvement and increasing chances of success.

Install on your platform

We auto-selected Claude Code based on this skill’s supported platforms.

Run in terminal (recommended)

terminal

claude mcp add nsfc-reviewers npx -- -y @trustedskills/nsfc-reviewers

Or manually add to ~/.claude/settings.json

~/.claude/settings.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nsfc-reviewers": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@trustedskills/nsfc-reviewers"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Requires Claude Code (claude CLI). Run claude --version to verify your install.

About This Skill

What it does

The Nsfc Reviewers skill simulates feedback from expert reviewers for National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) research proposals. It analyzes proposal documents to identify potential weaknesses and areas for improvement, providing insights into risks and suggesting a prioritized sequence of modifications to increase the likelihood of success. The skill operates in either a parallel review mode (multiple independent reviews) or a single-group mode if parallel processing isn't available. Critically, it only reads, analyzes, and summarizes content; it does not modify source files or perform LaTeX compilation.

When to use it

Before submitting an NSFC proposal for review.
To identify potential weaknesses in a research proposal early on.
To understand the risks associated with a current version of a proposal if submitted today.
To prioritize areas for modification and improvement based on expert feedback simulation.
When seeking insights into whether a proposal would pass initial (函评) or panel (会评) review stages.

Key capabilities

Simulates NSFC reviewer feedback.
Analyzes proposals to identify risks and weaknesses.
Provides prioritized modification sequences.
Offers stage assessment (函评 / 会评).
Supports parallel review mode for multiple independent assessments.
Identifies consensus points and individual viewpoints across simulated reviewers.
Distinguishes between design flaws and compromises due to funding limitations.

Example prompts

"Review this proposal: [path/to/proposal.tex]"
"Simulate NSFC reviewer feedback on my research proposal, focusing on the innovation aspects."
"Analyze this proposal for potential risks if submitted today: [path/to/proposal.zip]"

Tips & gotchas

The skill requires at least one of proposal_path, proposal_file, or proposal_zip as input.
The skill prioritizes reading and analysis; it will not compile LaTeX documents or correct grammatical errors.
Proposal content is treated as sensitive information, and the skill avoids sending large portions of text externally unless explicitly requested by the user.

View Repository →

TrustedSkills Verification

Unlike other registries that point to live repositories, TrustedSkills pins every skill to a verified commit hash. This protects you from malicious updates — what you install today is exactly what was reviewed and verified.

Security Audits

Gen Agent Trust Hub	Pass
Socket	Pass
Snyk	Pass

Details

Version: vlatest
License
Author: huangwb8
Installs: 47

Repository (canonical source) →

🌐 Community

Passed automated security scans.