Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Peer Review

Listed
davila7·vlatest·other·MIT

Davila7's peer-review analyzes text for clarity, logic, and potential improvements based on established academic standards.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill peer-review -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

davila7

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

Nobody has reviewed this code. TrustedSkills indexes and links skills; it does not audit, run or scan them. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent — read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

We could not read this skill's source, so none of the checks below were run.

Not scanned. none of the 457 skills in the repository match this slug — it was most likely renamed or removed upstream after the registry indexed it Source recorded as davila7/claude-code-templates.
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

This skill provides systematic peer review for scientific manuscripts, grant proposals, and research applications. It assesses methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards based on established academic guidelines. The tool aims to provide constructive and rigorous evaluation to improve the quality of scientific writing and ensure adherence to relevant reporting standards like CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA.

When to use it

  • Conducting peer review for journal manuscripts.
  • Evaluating grant proposals and research applications.
  • Assessing the rigor of methodology and experimental design.
  • Reviewing statistical analyses and reporting standards.
  • Providing constructive feedback on scientific writing.

Key capabilities

  • Evaluates methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards.
  • Checks compliance with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA).
  • Provides constructive feedback on scientific writing.
  • Can generate peer review workflow diagrams, evaluation criteria decision trees, review process flowcharts, methodology assessment frameworks, quality assessment visualizations, and reporting guidelines compliance diagrams using the integrated scientific-schematics skill.
  • Automatically creates publication-quality images with proper formatting, accessibility features (colorblind-friendly, high contrast), and saves outputs to a designated directory.

Example prompts

  • "Please review this manuscript for clarity and adherence to CONSORT guidelines."
  • "Evaluate the methodology section of this grant proposal and identify any potential weaknesses."
  • "Assess the statistical analyses presented in this paper and ensure they are appropriate for the data."

Tips & gotchas

  • For new documents, consider generating scientific schematics using the integrated scientific-schematics skill to visually represent key concepts. You can describe your desired diagram in natural language (e.g., "Create a flowchart illustrating the peer review process").
  • The skill follows a structured workflow: Initial Assessment followed by Detailed Section-by-Section Review, adapting depth and focus based on the manuscript type.