Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Review Verification Protocol

Checked
existential-birds·vlatest·other·Apache-2.0

Automates review verification against established guidelines, flagging inconsistencies and potential fraud for human oversight.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill review-verification-protocol -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

existential-birds

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill passed all 6 checks. We read its files at one commit and looked for the things that make a skill dangerous to run — not for whether it works.

  • Declares what it does: passed

    SKILL.md parses and declares a name and a description.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned existential-birds/beagle at d1a74899fb.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Commit
d1a74899fb
Manifest
plugins/beagle-go/skills/review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md
Scanned
3 files, 740 lines
Copies in repo
3 — all of them scanned
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

This skill enables AI agents to systematically verify the accuracy and validity of information presented in reviews, ensuring data integrity before processing or acting on user feedback. It helps filter out unreliable or misleading content by cross-referencing claims against known facts or established criteria.

When to use it

  • Validating customer testimonials in e-commerce platforms before generating marketing summaries.
  • Auditing software review scores to detect potential manipulation or bot-generated ratings.
  • Ensuring factual consistency in news aggregation tools that rely on user-submitted corrections.
  • Pre-screening medical or technical product reviews for compliance with regulatory standards.

Key capabilities

  • Automated fact-checking of review statements against trusted sources.
  • Detection of inconsistent or contradictory information within review batches.
  • Confidence scoring for verified versus unverified claims in user-generated content.

Example prompts

  • "Verify the accuracy of these five product reviews using current specifications."
  • "Flag any reviews containing false claims about battery life based on official test data."
  • "Cross-reference restaurant health inspection scores with recent customer complaints."

Tips & gotchas

Ensure access to reliable reference databases for maximum verification accuracy. This skill may not catch subjective opinions but excels at identifying objective falsehoods.