Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Rubric

Listed
simhacker·vlatest·other·MIT

This skill generates structured rubrics for evaluating tasks or projects, ensuring consistent and objective feedback.

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add simhacker/moollm --skill rubric -a claude-code
  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

simhacker

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill failed 1 of 6 checks. A failure is not proof of bad intent; it means something in the code needs a human to look at it before you run it.

  • Declares what it does: failed

    No SKILL.md was found in the skill's directory.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned simhacker/moollm at 8f6d840b2f.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Scanned
0 files
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

This skill allows an AI agent to evaluate text based on a provided rubric. It can assess written work, code, or other textual outputs against specific criteria and provide feedback aligned with the rubric's guidelines. The skill aims to automate assessment processes and offer structured evaluations.

When to use it

  • Grading student essays: Provide a rubric for essay grading and have the AI agent evaluate submissions based on those criteria.
  • Code review: Use a rubric outlining code quality standards, then leverage the skill to assess code changes and identify areas for improvement.
  • Content evaluation: Evaluate marketing copy or blog posts against a rubric focused on clarity, tone, and engagement.
  • Automated feedback: Generate automated feedback reports based on rubric criteria for various written outputs.

Key capabilities

  • Rubric-based assessment
  • Textual output evaluation
  • Feedback generation aligned with rubric criteria
  • Assessment of code quality (when applicable)

Example prompts

  • "Evaluate this essay using the attached rubric."
  • "Assess this Python code snippet against the following coding style guide."
  • "Provide feedback on this marketing copy based on these brand guidelines."

Tips & gotchas

The accuracy of the assessment depends heavily on the clarity and specificity of the provided rubric. Ensure the rubric is well-defined and unambiguous for optimal results.