Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Widgetkit Code Review

Checked
existential-birds·vlatest·backend·Apache-2.0

Automates widget codebase reviews, identifying potential bugs, style inconsistencies, and performance bottlenecks with detailed suggestions.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill widgetkit-code-review -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

existential-birds

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill passed all 6 checks. We read its files at one commit and looked for the things that make a skill dangerous to run — not for whether it works.

  • Declares what it does: passed

    SKILL.md parses and declares a name and a description.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned existential-birds/beagle at d1a74899fb.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Commit
d1a74899fb
Manifest
plugins/beagle-ios/skills/widgetkit-code-review/SKILL.md
Scanned
5 files, 489 lines
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

The widgetkit-code-review skill enables AI agents to perform automated code reviews on WidgetKit components, ensuring adherence to best practices and identifying potential issues before deployment. It streamlines the development workflow by providing immediate feedback on component logic and structure within the backend environment.

When to use it

  • Before merging a pull request containing new or modified WidgetKit widgets.
  • When verifying that custom widget implementations follow established coding standards.
  • To quickly identify syntax errors or logical flaws in complex data-driven components.
  • During the initial setup of a new project to establish consistent review criteria.

Key capabilities

  • Automated analysis of WidgetKit source code.
  • Identification of common anti-patterns and bugs.
  • Validation of component architecture and data binding.
  • Generation of actionable feedback for developers.

Example prompts

  • "Run a full code review on my latest WidgetKit implementation to check for memory leaks."
  • "Analyze this specific widget file for compliance with our team's backend coding standards."
  • "Identify any potential security vulnerabilities in the data fetching logic of these widgets."

Tips & gotchas

Ensure your codebase is properly indexed before initiating a review to avoid false negatives. While effective for standard patterns, complex architectural decisions may still require human oversight beyond automated checks.