Skip to content
TrustedSkillsbeta
Back to all skills

Evaluation

Checked
xfstudio·vlatest·writing

This AI evaluates text for sentiment, style, and quality, offering insights to refine content and improve communication effectiveness.

Repository

Install on your platform

Showing Claude Code. One command installs this skill into any of the agents below.

  1. 1

    Run this in your project

    terminal
    $ npx skills add xfstudio/skills --skill evaluation -a claude-code

  2. Uses the open-source skills CLI and needs Node.js. Add -g to install it for your user instead of this project.

What we know about this skill

Publisher

xfstudio

Taken from the source listing. We haven't verified who controls this account.

Install target

Live repository

Not pinned. Installing fetches whatever the repository holds at the time you run the command.

No human has reviewed this code. The checks below are a static scan of the files at one commit — nobody has run this skill or judged whether it works. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent, so read the source before you install it.

Automated safety checks

scanned

This skill passed all 6 checks. We read its files at one commit and looked for the things that make a skill dangerous to run — not for whether it works.

  • Declares what it does: passed

    SKILL.md parses and declares a name and a description.

    SKILL.md exists, its frontmatter parses, and it declares a name and a description.

  • No undeclared network calls: passed

    Makes no network calls.

    Every host the skill dials — from its scripts, its config endpoints or the commands it tells the agent to run — is either well-known package and API infrastructure or declared in its own frontmatter. Links in documentation are not counted.

  • No obfuscated payloads: passed

    No encoded or obfuscated payloads.

    No base64, hex or compressed blob is decoded and then executed, and no encoded shell commands.

  • No credential access: passed

    Reads no keys, tokens, keychains or credential files.

    Neither the code nor the SKILL.md instructions read SSH keys, cloud credentials, keychains, token stores, browser cookie databases or dotfiles that hold secrets.

  • No pipe-to-shell installers: passed

    No pipe-to-shell or download-and-run installers.

    No `curl … | sh` pattern, in the code or in the instructions, that runs code fetched at run time.

  • Pinned to a commit: passed

    Scanned xfstudio/skills at 1bf6044db2.

    The exact upstream commit SHA that was scanned is recorded, so the result refers to specific bytes.

Commit
1bf6044db2
Manifest
evaluation/SKILL.md
Scanned
1 file, 235 lines
This is a static scan, not a review. It reads the skill's files; it does not run them, and it cannot tell you whether the skill is any good or whether the code does what its description says. A skill runs with whatever access you give your agent.
What each check looks for →

About this skill

What it does

The xfstudio-evaluation skill provides capabilities for assessing and scoring various outputs. It can evaluate text, code, or other forms of data based on provided criteria. The evaluation process generates a score and potentially supporting feedback to indicate the quality of the assessed item.

When to use it

  • Code Review: Automatically assess the correctness and efficiency of generated code snippets.
  • Content Quality Check: Evaluate written content for grammar, clarity, and adherence to style guidelines.
  • Creative Writing Assessment: Score stories or poems based on criteria like plot development and characterization.
  • Data Validation: Determine if a dataset meets specific quality standards.

Key capabilities

  • Text evaluation
  • Code evaluation
  • Scoring outputs
  • Providing feedback

Example prompts

  • "Evaluate this Python code snippet for potential errors: [code]"
  • "Score this paragraph on its clarity and conciseness: [paragraph]"
  • "Assess the quality of this short story based on plot, character development, and writing style."

Tips & gotchas

The skill's effectiveness depends heavily on clearly defined evaluation criteria. Providing detailed instructions or a rubric will yield more accurate and useful results.